Thursday, April 16, 2009

Women's Rights Laws: Islamic vs. Democratic

The fair sex in Afghanistan are furious about recently passed Taliban-friendly laws regarding men's veto rights over women's preferances in conjugal and personal matters. Simply the men are the roosters and can demand sitting rights on their hens when they want without regard to the hens appetite. Also if men think that the proper role for their wife is barefoot, pregnant and shut in then so be the will of the bearded one.

Of course this is well over the limits of a harmonious marriage relationship. Our western democracies threw out such bad behavior ages ago. But look what that liberality got us. Women like Hillary Clinton, Barbra Striesand, Whoopi Goldberg and Madonna are given freedom to roam and influence others with their bad behavior. And the further fallout is the children that sprang from a decandant philosophy of social rights both for men and women. 

An example of that decandance would be the kike Woody Allen. He's in the news today because he's suing American Apparel for using his unauthorized image in Hasidic hair style and clothing. Woody is the guy who was tried for molesting his 7 year old adopted son. He also married his former wife Mia Farrow's adopted daughter. He was having an affair with Soon-Yi Previn while married to Farrow. Ironically he got an Oscar from the other kikes in Hollywood who continually piss on what's left of the important parts of American culture for his women's picture "Annie Hall". 

Somewhere in the middle of Islamic and democratic laws of society is where we should aim to be. But there shouldn't be a place for Woody in any culture.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 06, 2007

Islamist's Defeat Is Somalia's Loss ?

Consider this analogy. Mogadishu, Somalia and surrounding areas are like an American slum or blighted-urban area. The warlords in Somalia are like the rival gangs in American crime hot spots. They both deal in drugs, commit murders, rob, rape and sell protection to the "civilians" caught in the crossfire. These dismal facts have persisted in Somalia since 1991.

In 2006, The Somalia Islamic Courts Council ran the warlords out of Mogadishu. The ICC then administered Islamic Sharia Law. Drugs were banned. Rapes, murders and robberies nosedived because of the law's enforcement. Businessmen and residents liked and supported the legal paradigm. Now the ICC is gone because of C.I.A. backing of Ethiopia.

But absent the terrorist wing of Muslim law, couldn't criminal hotspots in America benefit from Sharia Law or some such discipline?

Labels: , ,