Same Sex Marriage & Required Blood Tests

The latest Field Poll of California voters show a shift to a majority now favoring-51% to 42%- same sex marriages in the state. According to Mark DiCamillo, Field Poll director, " It's a generational replacement, with older folks being replaced by younger voters very much in favor of same sex marriage". A"....generational replacement..."? That's optomistic. Not that we all need to be replaced but what about the homosexual diseases that may make this homosexual movement a one or two generational phenomenon and/or children normally springing from mostly heterosexual coupling?

The young who are in favor are aged 18-29 with the older being 50+ voting no. A few weeks ago the Center For Disease Control released a survey of teenage girls across all races. It showed 1 in 4 girls had a STD (sexually transmitted disease). That's America's upcoming breeding stock who are right behind the 18-29 age group that voted 68% in favor of same sex marriage.

Normally people date many times before finally popping the question about marriage. Will this new attitude towards same sex marriage encourage bisexual dating before settling down to a homosexual or a heterosexual marriage? Speaking of popping the question. Will any of the ambivalent sexual adventurers pop the question to their new partner " Where you been honey and who with ?". Maybe they wouldn't want to bring up the subject because they may be infected themselves?

No one has the "right"to infect another with a STD. No one should expect others to pay for their spreading avoidable diseases. At some point -like now- mandatory blood tests for STDs including AIDS/HIV have to be passed before marriage licenses are issued.

U.C.Regents Chairman Richard Blum:Wrong Man For Job

Today the San Francisco Chronicle carried a front page article written by Tanya Schevitz about University of California Regents Chairman Richard Blum. He's been on the board since 2002 but was moved up to the Chairmans slot last year. The article was supposed to be favorable but the facts that were used seemed to indicate otherwise. Baiting-terms like " alpha dog", "gangbusters style" and " [Blum's] streamlining the university bloated headquarters structure" fell short . For example, Blum's so-called "accomplishments"include making it easier to have private donors pay for U.C. projects! Oh yea he also got the banks to increase U.C. credit line to $10 billion from $1 billion.

So where's the beef? Or I should say "Where's the cut in the fat?" The article points out that there are 179,000 U.C. employees for the 209,000 students. They must be bumping into each other. I guess one way to tell the difference between them is the student has a hurried, concerned look whereas the employee has a relaxed look because the U.C. job over pays and it's damn near impossible to lose your job.

Blum is Senator Diane Feinstein's husband. He's parlayed her connections into lucrative military contracts and has profited from base closing a.k.a. real estate swindles where the U.S. taxpayer comes up short. So Dickie Blum is the last person who is going to make waves about over paid bureauacracies . And so the U.C. system will get fixed when problems like Blum get fixed.