Eliot Spitzer & Alan Dershowitz Connected To Israel & AIPAC ?

What laws apply to a bar mitzvahed Jew? The dictionary says a bar mitzvahed male is a "son of divine law". So since Jews are the self proclaimed "chosen people" their circular logic leads some delusional Jews to think that only laws they choose to obey are applicable . That certainly is a lot less laws that gentiles or Palestinians obey.

Hello Alan Dershowitz. The little kike was op-eding in the "chosen" Wall Street Journal today. He's bemoaning the fate of fellow bar mitzvahed, ex governor of New York Eliot Spitzer. The article was titled " The Entrapment Of Eliot".

Little Al thinks that " moving money around" in a money laundering fashion is OK when the object is to keep information away from Spitzer's wife. The FEDS should just get lost. After all Spitzer is not a front for a terrorist organization. But we only have Little Al's opinion that Spitzer was trying to keep the money movements away from his wife's knowledge. As it turns out ,the procurer of the Emperors VIP Club (prostitution brothel) holds an Israeli passport!

Now some of us think that Israel is a terrorist nation . And AIPAC is one of it's tentacles that has a financial grip on the testicles and vulva of many members of our Congress. So if a bar mitzvahed Jew is moving money around in a criminal fashion then the FEDS should follow the money. They may find that Israel/AIPAC is connected. It's for sure that AIPAC contributed to Spitzers campaign fund.

A Policy Of Torture Against Serious Crime?

The WSJ op-ed page waved the little, kike attorney Alan Dershowitz in front of me this morning. So I couldn't help but respond. His article titled " Democrats And Waterboarding" advocated a strong democratic party platform against terrorists. He encouraged democrats to accept waterboarding and presumably other forms of torture in certain circumstances in America's fight against terrorists. He implies the end justifies the means.

Well if torture is to become part of America's culture, then why limit it's use against suspected terrorists? Why not broaden it's application to homocide and/or arson suspects? After all, these are particularly heinous crimes that society at large needs to find out about the truth. And that's the rub. Once the philosophy of law enforcement includes torture then it's only a matter of time before other criminal actions serious or not become eligible for the treatment of torture.

The NAZIs used torture. Maybe the SS used torture on an Alan Dershowitz relative. When will these kikes learn?